ICORE Conference Portal

Sign in with LinkedIn
Signing in with LinkedIn authorizes us to store your name, email address, headline and display picture. why?
Back to search

Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference

Acronym: DATE
DBLP Source: https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/date
Source: CORE2023
Rank: B
Field Of Research: CSE - Computer Systems Engineering
Field Of Research: 4612 - Software engineering (h-index) (citation)
Source: CORE2021
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 4612 - Software engineering
Source: CORE2020
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 4612 - Software engineering
Source: CORE2018
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 1005 - Communications Technologies†
Source: CORE2017
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 1005 - Communications Technologies†
Source: CORE2014
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 1005 - Communications Technologies†
Source: CORE2013
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 1005 - Communications Technologies†
Source: ERA2010
Rank: B
Field Of Research: 1005 - Communications Technologies†
Source: CORE2008
Rank: A
FoR Codes with a may be old and no longer in use

Comments (6)

Average User Rating: 5.0

Welcoming: 4.7
Feedback: 4.8
Networking: 5.0
Interaction: 5.0
Top people: 5.0
Worthwhile: 5.0

Sort by:

Animesh Basak Chowdhury wrote: Feb. 21, 2019, 6:23 p.m.
DATE should have a higher ranking. For EDA community, this is the next best forum after DAC.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:
Dey Sukanta wrote: Nov. 5, 2019, 4:03 a.m.
DATE must be ranked A. This is the best conference after DAC. This core conference rankings are not reliable.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:
Dey Somdip wrote: April 16, 2020, 2:06 a.m.
This is the best conference after DAC for the EDA community. The rank of DATE should be higher than B and CORE ranking seems unreliable.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:
Di Carlo Stefano wrote: Oct. 16, 2024, 7:39 p.m.
DATE is the top European conference for Design Automation and Testing. Ranking it B is in my opinion incorrect. It receives yearly more than 1000 submissions and has strict acceptance rate rules. Moreover, it is wrong to categorize it under software engineering. It is into System Design.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
Pearce Hammond wrote: March 12, 2025, 7:58 p.m.
DATE is one of the top conferences for EDA design automation. Ranking it B is wrong, it is too low. DATE is a very competitive venue which is difficult to get in to, and as a result publications tend to be of very high quality.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:
Capotondi Alessandro wrote: March 12, 2025, 9:41 p.m.
DATE is the most important Electronic Design Automation (EDA) and Digital Design conference, along with DAC. There is no point in classifying it as B.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

You must sign in to leave comments