ICORE Conference Portal

Sign in with LinkedIn
Signing in with LinkedIn authorizes us to store your name, email address, headline and display picture. why?

Back to search

International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation

Acronym: ICST

DBLP Source: https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icst

Source: CORE2023

Rank: A

Field Of Research: 4612 - Software engineering (h-index) (citation)

Source: CORE2021

Rank: A

Field Of Research: 4612 - Software engineering

Source: CORE2020

Rank: A

Field Of Research: 4612 - Software engineering

Source: CORE2018

Rank: A

Field Of Research: 0803 - Computer Software†

Requested rerank from C to A. Rerank to A agreed. (Data 1) (Decision)

Source: CORE2017

Rank: C

Field Of Research: 0803 - Computer Software†

Source: CORE2014

Rank: C

Field Of Research: 0803 - Computer Software†

Source: CORE2013

Rank: C

Field Of Research: 0803 - Computer Software†

Source: ERA2010

Rank: C

Field Of Research: 0803 - Computer Software†

FoR Codes with a † may be old and no longer in use

Comments (5)

Average User Rating: 4.8

Welcoming:	5.0
Feedback:	5.0
Networking:	5.0
Interaction:	5.0
Top people:	5.0
Worthwhile:	5.0

Bardin Sébastien wrote: April 29, 2017, 7:29 p.m.

Clearly under-rated conference, should be somewhere in between A and B.

Rating:

The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Lionel Briand wrote: Aug. 25, 2017, 5:39 a.m.

There is no rational criterion to rank this conference as C. If you look at the number of submissions, attendees, acceptance rate, and the people who publish there, this conference has nothing to envy to A conferences such as ISSRE or ISSTA.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Franz Wotawa wrote: Aug. 25, 2017, 6:16 p.m.

Regarding the reviewing process, acceptance rate, the quality of the submissions as well as the accepted papers I do not see any difference to top conferences in the same area. The current rating does not reflect the quality of this conference!

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Gordon Fraser wrote: Sept. 12, 2017, 12:27 a.m.

This conference satisfies all the characteristics of an A conference as defined by CORE. It makes no sense to classify it as a C conference.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Nashid Noor wrote: April 5, 2024, 11:23 a.m.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

You must sign in to leave comments