This conference has a similar quality to ECML and should be ranked as A.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

I agree that this conference could be ranked A. It is the equivalent of ECML in Asia. It is very surprising that it is not ranked on CORA.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

I also agree that this conference should be ranked A.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Surprising that this is not A or A* considering the rigorous review process, high quality papers published and low acceptance ratio.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

This conference has an all-star organizing committee and it is great to meet them in the conference. However, getting paper accepted is quite difficult.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

I also agree that ACML should be ranked in tier A. The conference has a very rigorous and detailed review process.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

The review process is intense with 2 rounds. The quality of papers accepted is also high.

Rating:

This conference could be ranked A. All the proceddings have very high quality papers and well repuated, world-wide known speakers are invited. I'm surprised that ACML is unranked on CORE.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

This is an A* conference. Due to its smaller scale, more likely the review is stricter and of better quality than NIPS or ICML. The acceptance rates are very low too.

Rating:

If anyone looks at the papers accepted, acceptance rate, conference Chairs and Committee and the quality of subjects presented in the workshops, He/She understands, the conference should be ranked A without any hesitation.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile:

Surprised that this conference is unranked. It has solid committee, rigorous review process and low acceptance rate, as well as high quality keynote and tutorial. It should be ranked A for sure.

Rating:

This conference is welcoming to new attendees such as postgraduate students:
Referees for this conference provide high quality detailed feedback:
The conference program facilitates networking:
There is a culture of interaction and feedback following presentations:
The conference is routinely attended by top people in the area:
Overall, attending this conference is worthwhile: